# Ideas for improvements to `git log --graph`

I will maybe someday get around to dusting off my C and making these changes myself unless someone else does it first.

## Make the graph for `--topo-order` less wiggly

Imagine a long-running development branch periodically merges from master. The
`git log --graph --all --topo-order` is not as simple as it could be, as of git version 1.7.10.4.

It doesn't seem like a big deal in this example, but when you're trying to follow the history trails in ASCII and you've got several different branches displayed at once, it gets difficult quickly.

To simulate:

    git init example
    cd example
    git commit --allow-empty -m "initial empty commit"
    git branch dev
    for x in `seq 4`; do
        echo 1 >> 1.txt
        git add 1.txt
        git commit -m "commit"
        git checkout dev
        git merge --no-ff --no-edit master
        git checkout master
    done

The result:

    $ git log --graph --all --topo-order --decorate --oneline --boundary
    *   a9f8d93 (dev) Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\
    | * 5f32650 (HEAD, master) commit
    * |   b511501 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\ \
    | |/
    | * 4e6810e commit
    * |   2cd55b4 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\ \
    | |/
    | * 4f74695 commit
    * |   372799e Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\ \
    | |/
    | * 076669f commit
    |/
    * 7382440 initial empty commit

What I would like it to display:

    $ git log --graph --all --topo-order --decorate --oneline --boundary
    *   a9f8d93 (dev) Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\
    | * 5f32650 (HEAD, master) commit
    * | b511501 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\|
    | * 4e6810e commit
    * | 2cd55b4 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\|
    | * 4f74695 commit
    * | 372799e Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\|
    | * 076669f commit
    |/
    * 7382440 initial empty commit

## Let me specify which branches sink to the left.

Sometimes I'm faced with a very complex mess of merges and branches. I'd like to be able to ask git log to show me the graph, but to always set commits from specific branches into specific columns in the output. This might make for more line-drawing to connect the commits, but that's okay in this situation.

Using the very same repo above, I'd like to say "make left-most columns for master and dev, in that order" and see:

    $ git log --graph --all --topo-order --decorate --oneline --boundary --force-branch-columns=master,dev

    .-- master
    | .-- dev
    v v

      * a9f8d93 (dev) Merge branch 'master' into dev
     /|
    * | 5f32650 (HEAD, master) commit
    | * b511501 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |/|
    * | 4e6810e commit
    | * 2cd55b4 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |/|
    * | 4f74695 commit
    | * 372799e Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |/|
    * | 076669f commit
     \|
      * 7382440 initial empty commit

Maybe that doesn't seem like it's of much value, but let's throw another branch into the mix and see what it might look like.

Branch from somewhere in the middle of `dev`, create two commits, then merge from `master`:

    git checkout -b newbranch dev~3
    echo 2 >> 2.txt; git add 2.txt; git commit -m "commit"
    echo 2 >> 2.txt; git add 2.txt; git commit -m "commit"
    git merge --no-ff --no-edit master

The unmodified result:

    $ git log --graph --all --topo-order --decorate --oneline --boundary
    *   f745bf5 (HEAD, newbranch) Merge branch 'master' into newbranch
    |\
    * | 7031537 commit
    * | 416ab2c commit
    | | *   a9f8d93 (dev) Merge branch 'master' into dev
    | | |\
    | | |/
    | |/|
    | * | 5f32650 (master) commit
    | | *   b511501 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    | | |\
    | | |/
    | |/|
    | * | 4e6810e commit
    | | *   2cd55b4 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    | | |\
    | |/ /
    |/| /
    | |/
    | * 4f74695 commit
    * |   372799e Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |\ \
    | |/
    | * 076669f commit
    |/
    * 7382440 initial empty commit

What's most striking to me about the as-is unmodified output is the frequency with which we see this cross-legged pattern:

      *   b511501 Merge branch 'master' into dev
      |\
      |/
     /|
    * | 4e6810e commit
      *   2cd55b4 Merge branch 'master' into dev

Is the output perhaps intentionally like this to show which parent of a merge commit is the "first" parent? If so, that may be useful sometimes, so I wouldn't want to see that style completely removed in favor of my suggestion.

With different line-drawing logic and forced columns, it might look like this:

    $ git log --graph --all --topo-order --decorate --oneline --boundary --force-branch-columns=master,dev

    .-- master
    | .-- dev
    v v

        * f745bf5 (HEAD, newbranch) Merge branch 'master' into newbranch
       /|
      / * 7031537 commit
     /  * 416ab2c commit
    | * | a9f8d93 (dev) Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |/| |
    * | | 5f32650 (master) commit
    | * | b511501 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |/| |
    * | | 4e6810e commit
    | * | 2cd55b4 Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |/|/
    | /
    |/|
    * | 4f74695 commit
    | * 372799e Merge branch 'master' into dev
    |/|
    * | 076669f commit
     \|
      * 7382440 initial empty commit

I think that it is much easier with that visualization to track which commits are in master and dev, and see the points at which other branches forked from and merged with them.