Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@sutlxwhx
Last active February 12, 2025 08:30
Show Gist options
  • Save sutlxwhx/8f9370d5f0a946b2d43e397db4b1ae38 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save sutlxwhx/8f9370d5f0a946b2d43e397db4b1ae38 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Revisions

  1. sutlxwhx renamed this gist Aug 24, 2018. 1 changed file with 0 additions and 0 deletions.
    File renamed without changes.
  2. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 21, 2018. 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
    2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS provider
    * [scaleway](https://www.scaleway.com/)
    * [contabo](https://contabo.com/)
    * [arubacloud](https://www.arubacloud.com/)
    * [zomro.net](https://zomro.net/)
    * [zomro](https://zomro.net/)
    * [eurobyte](https://eurobyte.ru/)
    * [friendhosting](https://friendhosting.net/)

  3. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 21, 2018. 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
    2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -28,4 +28,4 @@ This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS provider

    It seems that contabo and zomro are obviously lying about using ssd servers. Arubacloud is not suitable for a long time high LA projects, they will just cut your VPS / VDS resources.
    <br/>You can check pastebin links for more detailed results.
    <br/>I ended up using 60$ dedicated server at hetzner but then I refactored my project structure and now I' am using 5$ VPS at digitalocean.
    <br/>I ended up using 60$ dedicated server at hetzner but then I refactored my project and now I' am using 5$ VPS at digitalocean.
  4. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 21, 2018. 1 changed file with 2 additions and 1 deletion.
    3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -27,4 +27,5 @@ This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS provider
    ## Discussion

    It seems that contabo and zomro are obviously lying about using ssd servers. Arubacloud is not suitable for a long time high LA projects, they will just cut your VPS / VDS resources.
    You can check pastebin links for more detailed results.
    <br/>You can check pastebin links for more detailed results.
    <br/>I ended up using 60$ dedicated server at hetzner but then I refactored my project structure and now I' am using 5$ VPS at digitalocean.
  5. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 21, 2018. 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
    2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

    This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS providers using [nench.sh](https://github.com/n-st/nench) server benchmark.

    ##Participants:
    ## Participants:
    * [hetzner](https://www.hetzner.com/)
    * [digitalocean](https://www.digitalocean.com/)
    * [scaleway](https://www.scaleway.com/)
  6. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 21, 2018. 2 changed files with 9 additions and 99 deletions.
    90 changes: 0 additions & 90 deletions arubacloud.com_25$_nench.log
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
    -------------------------------------------------
    nench.sh v2017.06.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
    benchmark timestamp: 2017-12-17 12:12:44 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------

    Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v4 @ 1.70GHz
    CPU cores: 4
    Frequency: 1699.998 MHz
    RAM: 7.8G
    Swap:
    Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-97-generic x86_64

    Disks:
    sda 160G HDD

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    5.792 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    9.924 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    2.289 seconds

    ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 67.1 us / 226.2 us / 20.0 ms / 913.3 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
    generated 9.66 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.36 GiB, 1.93 k iops, 483.0 MiB/s

    dd: sequential write speed
    1st run: 604.63 MiB/s
    2nd run: 891.69 MiB/s
    3rd run: 780.11 MiB/s
    average: 758.81 MiB/s

    IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4: 217.61.0.xxxx

    Cachefly CDN: 56.33 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL): 43.44 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US): 4.58 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR): 60.06 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA): 10.68 MiB/s

    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------

    -------------------------------------------------
    nench.sh v2017.06.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
    benchmark timestamp: 2017-12-17 12:13:50 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------

    Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v4 @ 1.70GHz
    CPU cores: 4
    Frequency: 1699.998 MHz
    RAM: 7.8G
    Swap:
    Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-97-generic x86_64

    Disks:
    sda 160G HDD

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    5.013 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    9.031 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    2.254 seconds

    ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 63.6 us / 205.0 us / 20.0 ms / 935.2 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
    generated 11.8 k requests in 5.02 s, 2.89 GiB, 2.36 k iops, 589.9 MiB/s

    dd: sequential write speed
    1st run: 782.97 MiB/s
    2nd run: 953.67 MiB/s
    3rd run: 870.70 MiB/s
    average: 869.12 MiB/s

    IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4: 217.61.0.xxxx

    Cachefly CDN: 84.18 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL): 84.67 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US): 3.72 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR): 77.32 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA): 3.49 MiB/s

    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------

    18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -15,16 +15,16 @@ This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS provider
    ## Results
    | Provider | CPU | SSD | NETWORK |
    | --- | --- | --- | --- |
    | hetzner | highest | high | medium |
    | digitalocean | medium | high | highest |
    | scaleway | lowest | low | highest |
    | contabo | low | lowest | lowest |
    | arubacloud | low | highest | medium |
    | zomro | low | lowest | medium |
    | eurobyte | high | lowest | high |
    | friendhosting | medium | medium | lowest |
    | [hetzner](https://pastebin.com/raw/ddDi2YiU) | highest | high | medium |
    | [digitalocean](https://pastebin.com/raw/kU6TJqem) | medium | high | highest |
    | [scaleway](https://pastebin.com/raw/kCdN9YmV) | lowest | low | highest |
    | [contabo](https://pastebin.com/raw/fHYSiYWd) | low | lowest | lowest |
    | [arubacloud](https://pastebin.com/raw/8SSmuMxN) | low | highest | medium |
    | [zomro](https://pastebin.com/raw/3Vigt4Zi) | low | lowest | medium |
    | [eurobyte](https://pastebin.com/raw/ic5B6nxK) | high | lowest | high |
    | [friendhosting](https://pastebin.com/raw/iNFcR6UM) | medium | medium | lowest |

    ## Discussion

    It seems that contabo and zomro are obviously lying about using ssd servers. Arubacloud is not suitable for a long time high LA projects, they will just cut your VPS / VDS resources.
    You can check all attached files for more detailed results.
    You can check pastebin links for more detailed results.
  7. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 21, 2018. 2 changed files with 93 additions and 2 deletions.
    90 changes: 90 additions & 0 deletions arubacloud.com_25$_nench.log
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
    -------------------------------------------------
    nench.sh v2017.06.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
    benchmark timestamp: 2017-12-17 12:12:44 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------

    Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v4 @ 1.70GHz
    CPU cores: 4
    Frequency: 1699.998 MHz
    RAM: 7.8G
    Swap:
    Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-97-generic x86_64

    Disks:
    sda 160G HDD

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    5.792 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    9.924 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    2.289 seconds

    ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 67.1 us / 226.2 us / 20.0 ms / 913.3 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
    generated 9.66 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.36 GiB, 1.93 k iops, 483.0 MiB/s

    dd: sequential write speed
    1st run: 604.63 MiB/s
    2nd run: 891.69 MiB/s
    3rd run: 780.11 MiB/s
    average: 758.81 MiB/s

    IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4: 217.61.0.xxxx

    Cachefly CDN: 56.33 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL): 43.44 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US): 4.58 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR): 60.06 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA): 10.68 MiB/s

    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------

    -------------------------------------------------
    nench.sh v2017.06.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
    benchmark timestamp: 2017-12-17 12:13:50 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------

    Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v4 @ 1.70GHz
    CPU cores: 4
    Frequency: 1699.998 MHz
    RAM: 7.8G
    Swap:
    Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-97-generic x86_64

    Disks:
    sda 160G HDD

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    5.013 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    9.031 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    2.254 seconds

    ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 63.6 us / 205.0 us / 20.0 ms / 935.2 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
    generated 11.8 k requests in 5.02 s, 2.89 GiB, 2.36 k iops, 589.9 MiB/s

    dd: sequential write speed
    1st run: 782.97 MiB/s
    2nd run: 953.67 MiB/s
    3rd run: 870.70 MiB/s
    average: 869.12 MiB/s

    IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4: 217.61.0.xxxx

    Cachefly CDN: 84.18 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL): 84.67 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US): 3.72 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR): 77.32 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA): 3.49 MiB/s

    No IPv6 connectivity detected
    -------------------------------------------------

    5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
    ## Introduction

    This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS providers using [nench.sh](https://github.com/n-st/nench) server benchmark.
    <br/>Participants:

    ##Participants:
    * [hetzner](https://www.hetzner.com/)
    * [digitalocean](https://www.digitalocean.com/)
    * [scaleway](https://www.scaleway.com/)
    @@ -25,5 +26,5 @@ This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS provider

    ## Discussion

    It seems that contabo is obviously lying about using ssd servers. Arubacloud is not suitable for a long time high LA projects, they will just cut your VPS / VDS resources.
    It seems that contabo and zomro are obviously lying about using ssd servers. Arubacloud is not suitable for a long time high LA projects, they will just cut your VPS / VDS resources.
    You can check all attached files for more detailed results.
  8. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 20, 2018. 1 changed file with 6 additions and 3 deletions.
    9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -10,8 +10,6 @@ This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS provider
    * [zomro.net](https://zomro.net/)
    * [eurobyte](https://eurobyte.ru/)
    * [friendhosting](https://friendhosting.net/)
    It seems that contabo is obviously lying about using ssd servers. Arubacloud is not suitable for a long time high LA projects, they will just cut your VPS / VDS resources.
    You can check all attached files for more detailed results.

    ## Results
    | Provider | CPU | SSD | NETWORK |
    @@ -23,4 +21,9 @@ You can check all attached files for more detailed results.
    | arubacloud | low | highest | medium |
    | zomro | low | lowest | medium |
    | eurobyte | high | lowest | high |
    | friendhosting | medium | medium | lowest |
    | friendhosting | medium | medium | lowest |

    ## Discussion

    It seems that contabo is obviously lying about using ssd servers. Arubacloud is not suitable for a long time high LA projects, they will just cut your VPS / VDS resources.
    You can check all attached files for more detailed results.
  9. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 20, 2018. 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
    2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ You can check all attached files for more detailed results.

    ## Results
    | Provider | CPU | SSD | NETWORK |
    | ------------- | ------------- |
    | --- | --- | --- | --- |
    | hetzner | highest | high | medium |
    | digitalocean | medium | high | highest |
    | scaleway | lowest | low | highest |
  10. sutlxwhx revised this gist Aug 20, 2018. 1 changed file with 1 addition and 0 deletions.
    1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ You can check all attached files for more detailed results.

    ## Results
    | Provider | CPU | SSD | NETWORK |
    | ------------- | ------------- |
    | hetzner | highest | high | medium |
    | digitalocean | medium | high | highest |
    | scaleway | lowest | low | highest |
  11. sutlxwhx created this gist Aug 20, 2018.
    25 changes: 25 additions & 0 deletions comparison.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
    ## Introduction

    This is a comparison that I made when I was testing different VPS / VDS providers using [nench.sh](https://github.com/n-st/nench) server benchmark.
    <br/>Participants:
    * [hetzner](https://www.hetzner.com/)
    * [digitalocean](https://www.digitalocean.com/)
    * [scaleway](https://www.scaleway.com/)
    * [contabo](https://contabo.com/)
    * [arubacloud](https://www.arubacloud.com/)
    * [zomro.net](https://zomro.net/)
    * [eurobyte](https://eurobyte.ru/)
    * [friendhosting](https://friendhosting.net/)
    It seems that contabo is obviously lying about using ssd servers. Arubacloud is not suitable for a long time high LA projects, they will just cut your VPS / VDS resources.
    You can check all attached files for more detailed results.

    ## Results
    | Provider | CPU | SSD | NETWORK |
    | hetzner | highest | high | medium |
    | digitalocean | medium | high | highest |
    | scaleway | lowest | low | highest |
    | contabo | low | lowest | lowest |
    | arubacloud | low | highest | medium |
    | zomro | low | lowest | medium |
    | eurobyte | high | lowest | high |
    | friendhosting | medium | medium | lowest |