BlakeGardner/install nano.sh

Worked for me:

brew install nano nanorc
echo 'include "/usr/local/Cellar/nano/*/share/nano/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

Worked for me:

brew install nano nanorc
echo 'include "/opt/homebrew/share/nanorc/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

macOS Ventura 13.2.1
Homebrew 4.0.13

Thanks, updated the gist @s-ota-66

Thanks all for the guide! Can confirm current version is working on 13.3.1

Better to use $(brew --prefix) to work with both Intel & ARM chips

brew install nano nanorc
echo "include \"$(brew --prefix)/share/nanorc/*.nanorc\"" >> ~/.nanorc

echo 'include "/usr/local/Cellar/nano/*/share/nano/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

Works for Sonora

echo 'include "/usr/local/Cellar/nano/*/share/nano/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

Probably it would be better to use

echo 'include "'"$(brew --cellar nano)"'/*/share/nano/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

so in such case it will use the right path depends on if mac uses Intel or Apple Silicon

as of today, may 13th 2024, the following works without issues on sonoma 14.4.1 with and brew 4.2.21:

brew install nano
echo 'include "'"$(brew --cellar nano)"'/*/share/nano/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

thanks everyone for keeping this going :)

Updated the gist thanks @tobsn

It took me way too long to notice that the /usr/bin/nano that comes with macOS is actually "UW PICO 5.09". GNU nano installed via homebrew immediately followed that .nanorc and applied syntax highlighting. 😄

as of today, may 13th 2024, the following works without issues on sonoma 14.4.1 with and brew 4.2.21:

brew install nano
echo 'include "'"$(brew --cellar nano)"'/*/share/nano/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

thanks everyone for keeping this going :)

+1 thanks @tobsn

As of today, may 13th 2024, the following works without issues on macOS Sequoia 15.6 (24G84) and Homebrew 4.6.4:

brew install nano
echo 'include "'"$(brew --cellar nano)"'/*/share/nano/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

Why does every file need to be listed? The following works for me:

brew install nano
echo 'include "/usr/local/share/nano/*.nanorc"' >> ~/.nanorc

The main difference between the two code snippets lies in how they handle the installation and configuration of nano and nanorc using Homebrew on macOS.

Key Differences:

• Installation of nanorc: The first snippet (@BlakeGardner) explicitly installs nanorc, while the second snippet (@lorthirk) does not. However, nano might still include syntax highlighting files that can be used without the separate nanorc formula.
• Path Dynamism: The first snippet dynamically finds the path to nano Cellar and includes syntax highlighting files from there. The second snippet uses a fixed path that assumes Homebrew's standard symlink behavior.
• Flexibility and Portability: The dynamic path approach in the first snippet might be more flexible and resilient to changes in Homebrew's directory structure or nano formula. The fixed path in the second snippet might break if Homebrew changes its symlink structure or if nano formula's installation path changes.

Choosing Between Them

• Use the first snippet if you want to ensure you're getting the syntax highlighting configurations specifically packaged with nano in a way that's dynamically linked to Homebrew's Cellar structure.
• Use the second snippet if you're relying on the standard Homebrew symlink structure and want a simpler configuration line, assuming nano includes necessary syntax highlighting files in /usr/local/share/nano/.

Given the current Homebrew structure and nano formula, both approaches should work, but the dynamic path might offer more future-proofing against changes in Homebrew or the formulae.