OceanLi ohdearquant

Performance Analysis Report

NeuralForecast NHITS Integration Performance Validation

Date: June 2025
Analysis Period: Complete Integration Lifecycle
Report Type: Comprehensive Performance Validation

🎯 Key Features Documented

Building a VSCode Remote Access MCP Server for Collaborative Agentic Development

Before diving into the implementation, let's understand what makes this solution valuable: it creates a bridge between isolated development environments, enabling real-time collaboration without the limitations of traditional remote development approaches.

MCP Server Architecture

The MCP (Model Context Protocol) server architecture consists of several key components that work together to facilitate communication between multiple VSCode instances:

A centralized MCP server that handles message routing and state synchronization
Client connections from multiple workspaces or codespaces

agentic-robots-txt: Dynamic Robots.txt with MCP Integration

agentic-robots-txt is a Node.js package that generates a dynamic robots.txt file with extended directives for AI agents, and exposes those rules via Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP). It helps web developers control standard web crawlers and guide AI model agents by providing an agentic manifest and agent guide references in the robots.txt. The package also includes an MCP server so AI agents (MCP clients) can retrieve these rules programmatically. Key features include dynamic rule generation, MCP compliance, security controls, and easy integration into frameworks like Express.

Dynamic `robots.txt` Generation

A robots.txt file defines crawl rules for bots (traditionally search engines) by specifying allowed and disallowed paths (The ultimate guide to robots.txt • Yoast). agentic-robots-txt automates creatin

o1 Pro: Insider Trading Mirroring System

Introduction

In the dynamic world of financial markets, staying ahead of insider movements can provide significant strategic advantages.

The Insider Trading Mirroring System is a sophisticated tool designed to monitor publicly disclosed insider trades and automatically mirror these actions within your investment portfolio. By leveraging cutting-edge technologies like LangGraph and integrating real-time data feeds, this system offers a seamless and automated approach to capitalizing on insider trading activities.

Legal & Ethical Considerations
It's crucial to emphasize that this system only processes publicly available insider trading information, as mandated by regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Engaging in trading based on material non-public information is illegal and unethical. Users must ensure compliance with all relevant laws and regulations and consult with legal and compliance professiona

SynthLang: A Hyper-Efficient Prompt Language for AI

SynthLang is a hyper-efficient prompt language designed to optimize interactions with Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4o by leveraging logographical scripts and symbolic constructs. By compressing complex instructions into fewer tokens (reducing token usage by 40–70%), SynthLang significantly lowers inference latency, making it ideal for latency-sensitive applications such as high-frequency trading, real-time analytics, and compliance checks.

Additionally, SynthLang mitigates English-centric biases in multilingual models, enhancing information density and ensuring more equitable performance across diverse languages. Its scalable design maintains or improves task performance in translation, summarization, and question-answering, fostering faster, fairer, and more efficient AI-driven solutions.

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4o and Llama-2 exhibit English-dominant biases in intermediate embeddings, leading to inefficient and oft

Mixture of Reflection (MoR) Model: Detailed Implementation ## Forward: The Next Generation of AI Models

Reflection-based AI models are poised to redefine how AI is utilized, shifting from generating rapid, surface-level responses to producing thoughtful, in-depth analyses. These models emphasize self-evaluation and iterative improvement, leveraging internal feedback loops to refine outputs and enhance performance over multiple cycles.

This year has seen a marked shift toward reflection models, which differ from earlier Mixture of Experts (MoE) architectures. While MoE models efficiently handle specific tasks using specialized subnetworks, reflection-based models integrate iterative reasoning, enabling them to "think" before delivering results. This approach allows for evaluating and correcting reasoning pathways, ultimately improving performance through self-critique.

The proposed Mixture of Reflection (MoR) architecture builds on this foundation by combining the strengths of MoE with reflection-based re

	#!/usr/bin/env -S node --no-warnings=ExperimentalWarning --enable-source-maps

	// Claude Code is a Beta product per Anthropic's Commercial Terms of Service.
	// By using Claude Code, you agree that all code acceptance or rejection decisions you make,
	// and the associated conversations in context, constitute Feedback under Anthropic's Commercial Terms,
	// and may be used to improve Anthropic's products, including training models.
	// You are responsible for reviewing any code suggestions before use.

	// (c) Anthropic PBC. All rights reserved. Use is subject to Anthropic's Commercial Terms of Service (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/commercial-terms).

	# train_grpo.py
	#
	# See https://github.com/willccbb/verifiers for ongoing developments
	#
	"""
	citation:

	@misc{brown2025grpodemo,
	title={Granular Format Rewards for Eliciting Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities in Small Language Models},
	author={Brown, William},

	Begin by enclosing all thoughts within <thinking> tags, exploring multiple angles and approaches.
	Break down the solution into clear steps within <step> tags. Start with a 20-step budget, requesting more for complex problems if needed.
	Use <count> tags after each step to show the remaining budget. Stop when reaching 0.
	Continuously adjust your reasoning based on intermediate results and reflections, adapting your strategy as you progress.
	Regularly evaluate progress using <reflection> tags. Be critical and honest about your reasoning process.
	Assign a quality score between 0.0 and 1.0 using <reward> tags after each reflection. Use this to guide your approach:

	0.8+: Continue current approach
	0.5-0.7: Consider minor adjustments
	Below 0.5: Seriously consider backtracking and trying a different approach

	Understand the Task: Grasp the main objective, goals, requirements, constraints, and expected output.
	- Minimal Changes: If an existing prompt is provided, improve it only if it's simple. For complex prompts, enhance clarity and add missing elements without altering the original structure.
	- Reasoning Before Conclusions: Encourage reasoning steps before any conclusions are reached. ATTENTION! If the user provides examples where the reasoning happens afterward, REVERSE the order! NEVER START EXAMPLES WITH CONCLUSIONS!
	- Reasoning Order: Call out reasoning portions of the prompt and conclusion parts (specific fields by name). For each, determine the ORDER in which this is done, and whether it needs to be reversed.
	- Conclusion, classifications, or results should ALWAYS appear last.
	- Examples: Include high-quality examples if helpful, using placeholders [in brackets] for complex elements.
	- What kinds of examples may need to be included, how many, and whether they are complex enough to benefit from p