Created
May 22, 2018 21:25
-
-
Save walter/faa85d0f70c84a9d05f4085df48c42d0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Revisions
-
walter created this gist
May 22, 2018 .There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode charactersOriginal file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ ## From @bendemboski Ember Community Slack -testing channel [link](https://embercommunity.slack.com/messages/C045C9ABM/convo/C045C9ABM-1527023821.000621/) ... I'm pretty sure using native `async`/`await` in your application code is what's making you sad For two reasons -- one is that the code that runs after any `await` call will not be wrapped in a run loop because native promises aren't run loop aware, so anything after an `await` that uses the run loop, like calling `.set` on an Ember object, will trigger the auto-run assertion in tests The other problem you're probably having is that your tests aren't waiting for any of the async behavior to happen `Ember.run(() => service.create(name))` doesn't wait for any actual async behavior -- it just drains the run loop queues But your `await` calls will cause things to actually be async in the browser, and since your test isn't doing anything to wait for that behavior, it will end before all of your code has run So you could try ```JavaScript await Ember.run(() => service.create(name)) ``` and I believe that would get the test to wait for the call to complete But you're still vulnerable to the autorun assertion I mentioned before, so you probably want to turn those async functions into `ember-concurrency` tasks, which are runloop-aware