Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@xrmr
Forked from JoeyBurzynski/55-bytes-of-css.md
Created September 27, 2022 18:54
Show Gist options
  • Save xrmr/8d63d004e60f5da19f9cba5562e8e9cb to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save xrmr/8d63d004e60f5da19f9cba5562e8e9cb to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Revisions

  1. @JoeyBurzynski JoeyBurzynski revised this gist Sep 26, 2022. 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
    2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion 55-bytes-of-css.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -80,4 +80,4 @@ p,ul,ol {
    # References

    - [CSS Reference on MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS "CSS Reference on MDN")
    - [CodePen](https://codepen.io/JoeyBurzynski/pen/jOxYqwe "58 Bytes of CSS to Look Great Nearly Everywhere")
    - [CodePen](https://codepen.io/JoeyBurzynski/pen/jOxYqwe?editors=1100 "58 Bytes of CSS to Look Great Nearly Everywhere")
  2. @JoeyBurzynski JoeyBurzynski revised this gist Sep 26, 2022. 1 changed file with 1 addition and 0 deletions.
    1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions 55-bytes-of-css.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -80,3 +80,4 @@ p,ul,ol {
    # References

    - [CSS Reference on MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS "CSS Reference on MDN")
    - [CodePen](https://codepen.io/JoeyBurzynski/pen/jOxYqwe "58 Bytes of CSS to Look Great Nearly Everywhere")
  3. @JoeyBurzynski JoeyBurzynski revised this gist Mar 7, 2022. 1 changed file with 65 additions and 12 deletions.
    77 changes: 65 additions & 12 deletions 55-bytes-of-css.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
    # 58 bytes of css to look great nearly everywhere
    # 58 bytes of CSS to look great nearly everywhere

    when making this website, i wanted a simple, reasonable way to make it look good on most displays. not counting any minimization techniques, the following 58 bytes worked well for me:
    When making this website, i wanted a simple, reasonable way to make it look good on most displays. Not counting any minimization techniques, the following 58 bytes worked well for me:

    ```css
    main {
    @@ -10,20 +10,73 @@ main {
    }
    ```

    let's break this down.
    let's break this down:

    max-width: 38rem
    it appears that the default font size for most browsers is 16px, so 38rem is 608px. supporting 600px displays at a minimum seems reasonable.
    **max-width**: `38rem`
    > it appears that the default font size for most browsers is 16px, so 38rem is 608px. supporting 600px displays at a minimum seems reasonable.
    padding: 2rem
    if the display's width goes under 38rem, then this padding keeps things looking pretty good until around 256px. while this may seem optional, it actually hits two birds with one stone - the padding also provides sorely-needed top and bottom whitespace.
    **padding:** `2rem`
    > if the display's width goes under 38rem, then this padding keeps things looking pretty good until around 256px. while this may seem optional, it actually hits two birds with one stone - the padding also provides sorely-needed top and bottom whitespace.
    margin: auto
    this is really all that is needed to center the page, because main is a block element under semantic html5.
    **margin:** `auto`
    > this is really all that is needed to center the page, because main is a block element under semantic html5.
    a key insight: it took me a surprising number of iterations to arrive at this point. perhaps that speaks to the fact that i know nothing about "modern" web development, or, as i'm more inclined to believe, just how hard it is to keep it simple in a world of complication.
    **a key insight:** it took me a surprising number of iterations to arrive at this point. perhaps that speaks to the fact that i know nothing about "modern" web development, or, as i'm more inclined to believe, just how hard it is to keep it simple in a world of complication.

    update: following some discussion (see footer), i've since changed the padding to 1.5rem for a happier compromise between mobile and desktop displays.
    **update 1:** following some discussion, I've since changed the padding to `1.5rem` for a happier compromise between mobile and desktop displays.

    update 2: the ch unit was brought to my attention here, and i quite like it! i've since changed to 70ch/2ch, which looks nearly the same with 2 less bytes, except that the padding is a little bit smaller (a good thing for mobile).
    **update 2:** the [ch unit](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#ch "ch unit") was brought to my attention, and I quite like it! I've since changed to `70ch/2ch`, which looks nearly the same with 2 less bytes, except that the padding is a little bit smaller (_a good thing for mobile_).



    # 100 Bytes of CSS to look great everywhere (enhanced version)

    This should be simple drop-in css to look good on most displays:


    ```css
    html {
    max-width: 70ch;
    padding: 3em 1em;
    margin: auto;
    line-height: 1.75;
    font-size: 1.25em;
    }
    ```

    Let's break this down. I've adapted the original text with my own commentary.

    **max-width:** `70ch`
    > the "readable range" is usually 60-80 character widths, and CSS lets you express that directly with the `ch` unit.
    **padding:** `3em 1em`
    > If the display's width goes under the max-width set above, then this padding prevents edge-to-edge text on mobile. We use `3em` to provide top/bottom whitespace.
    **margin:** `auto`
    > This is really all that is needed to center the page - applied on html, because Dan's site doesnt have a semantic <main> tag and <html> is more likely to exist in most sites. That the top tag centers itself relative to nothing is unintuitive, but thats how browsers do.
    **line-height:** `1.75`
    > Spacing between the lines to help increase visual clarity. Always leave line height unitless because reasons.
    **font-size:** `1.5em`
    > I've noticed that recent design trends and screen sizes have tended toward bigger font sizes. Or maybe I'm getting old. Prefer `em` or `rem` over `px` if you want to let users scale it.
    You can use `:root` instead of `<html>` to guarantee that there is some selector present, but its a touch too fancy for me and uses an extra character :)

    ## Optional 100 more bytes

    ```css
    h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
    margin: 3em 0 1em;
    }

    p,ul,ol {
    margin-bottom: 2em;
    color: #1d1d1d;
    font-family: sans-serif;
    }
    ```

    # References

    - [CSS Reference on MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS "CSS Reference on MDN")
  4. @JoeyBurzynski JoeyBurzynski created this gist Apr 17, 2019.
    29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions 55-bytes-of-css.md
    Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
    @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
    # 58 bytes of css to look great nearly everywhere

    when making this website, i wanted a simple, reasonable way to make it look good on most displays. not counting any minimization techniques, the following 58 bytes worked well for me:

    ```css
    main {
    max-width: 38rem;
    padding: 2rem;
    margin: auto;
    }
    ```

    let's break this down.

    max-width: 38rem
    it appears that the default font size for most browsers is 16px, so 38rem is 608px. supporting 600px displays at a minimum seems reasonable.

    padding: 2rem
    if the display's width goes under 38rem, then this padding keeps things looking pretty good until around 256px. while this may seem optional, it actually hits two birds with one stone - the padding also provides sorely-needed top and bottom whitespace.

    margin: auto
    this is really all that is needed to center the page, because main is a block element under semantic html5.

    a key insight: it took me a surprising number of iterations to arrive at this point. perhaps that speaks to the fact that i know nothing about "modern" web development, or, as i'm more inclined to believe, just how hard it is to keep it simple in a world of complication.

    update: following some discussion (see footer), i've since changed the padding to 1.5rem for a happier compromise between mobile and desktop displays.

    update 2: the ch unit was brought to my attention here, and i quite like it! i've since changed to 70ch/2ch, which looks nearly the same with 2 less bytes, except that the padding is a little bit smaller (a good thing for mobile).